Gay blowjob long clips

I bet you love this topic...don't you, pedophile cum gurgler!

Projection the article.

This is a topic i would love to comment on now. On my way home I will comment see you soon. Prepare to text people lol

"The apathetics rule"

Sometimes I regale people with the story about a work event where they had a raffle. They gave you a ticket when you arrived - and I checked my bag... so I put it in my bra.

How do YOU read? - "That was my opinion,...", not MY JOB.

So uhhhh... this SCOTUS ruling is a little troubling on that baker guy

It literally is in the definition I provided, and here in your description you claim to have a phd, wonder how much does a phd cost these days, given your response.

Yet, again, we see millions of Muslims not practice sharia.

They are the Babies and older Children of God. They have to grow up. They need to focus on becoming fully Grown. Their they will find the wisdom of Jesus.

Josephus never mentions Luke, and Luke, himself never claims to be a physician. The fact is, that Acts is a forgery, very typical of a genre of adventure/travel fiction of the time. The author of Acts claims to be a companion of Paul, but he says things about Paul that are different from what Paul says about himself. The author, whoever he was, borrows material from Josephus, gets chronology wrong, and uses the Aneid as a source. Samuel Butler, James Tabor, Burton Mack are among many biblical scholars who warn against accepting Acts, and to never accept it over the known epistles of Paul. If Acts is a forgery, and it was written by the author of the gospel of Luke, what does that say about that gospel?

It says to test it..john 14 29. Test the prophecy..works. Believe by the word or by the works. 1/3 is prophecy for testing. Prove God exists. Get busy

The problem with people like YOU is.....

They're not debating; they're merely asserting a position, and walking away. In an actual debate, they'd be forced to forfeit.

Funny how you jump to the "ill" part immediately...

No, you don't have problems, you simply streamline. In 2018, most people under 50 aren't using checkbooks with the invention of the bank card and online bill payment. I can manage everything on the go. With something like Mint, you can set up auto billpay, designate how much money you want to spend in certain categories [ Housing, Utilities, Credit Card, Gas, Entertainment, Etc], you get a graphical dynamic interface via a piechart [or other chart of your preference] for noting where your money went, and it is updated every time you make a transaction. Versus if you were to do everything by hand -- you'd have to write down every transaction yourself, possibly maintain a receipt for later entry, and then sit down at the end of every week to track things.

I'm going to invoke the Wizard's Third Rule and excuse myself from this debate, primarily because people seem to be missing my point entirely.

What you think is not what is and will never be. Words can be interpreted in more than one way so the intent is far more important than the words themselves. If people started assuming that most possibly offensive things are said only in jest, the world would be so much more peaceful. Clearly, this woman has a complete inability to laugh at herself.

You just need a target for your hostilities and of course, a leader who will praise you for having them.

The thing is the brain is not fully developed until a person is 25. Thus, not all minors are capable of rational thought. If such a kid is bullied they may lash out in horrific fashion. With rehabilitation and maturity the kid wouldn't kill again thereby raising the question if the kid should be tried as an adult and sentenced to life?

The car (and our son) is on my ex's insurance.

Funny Clinton video....."CITIZENS YOU WILL ELECT ME, I WILL BE YOUR LEADER"

I have no idea, I vetoed it

So, you want us to be vegetables. Let's all be pond scum! No blood, no guts, just photo synthesis!

So your philosophy is two wrongs make a right?

Both are abuse and assault, one is merely less appalling than the other. Both are the result of ignorance.

"Most Christians world wide accept evolution."

Fair point. Most times I think it would be very flattering to have interested eyes ... but then it would start to lose appeal because some of those stares are creepy.

You keep saying that despite the Supreme Court upholding it in their decisions for quite a while.